Questo sito utilizza cookies. Se continui la navigazione significa che approvi i nostri termini di utilizzo di cookies. Per saperne di più, leggi qui.
Vai al contenuto principale
  • Italiano Choose language Scegli la lingua
    • English
Accedi
  • Home
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Assemblies
  • Dashboard Lite
  • Help

Designing a Model for Community Participation

Evolving inDICEs Community Creation

  • Il processo
  • Governance
  • Engagement Ideas
  • Personas

Modifiche a "Abirami: Researcher"

Modalità di visualizzazione confronto:
  • Unificato
    • Unificato
    • Affiancati
Modalità visualizzazione HTML:
  • Unescaped
    • Unescaped
    • Escaped

Titolo

  • +{"en"=>"Abirami: Researcher"}
  • +{"en"=>"Abirami: Researcher"}
Eliminazioni
Aggiunte
  • +{"en"=>"Abirami: Researcher"}
Eliminazioni
Aggiunte
  • +{"en"=>"Abirami: Researcher"}

Corpo del testo

  • +["

    What if:

    Scenario 4: What if as a (role) researcher I could (action) analyze data in the participatory platform with (Tools/Data/features from the inDICEs observatory) the inDICEs (webLyzard) dashboard so that (outcome/Impact) allow to analyze and compare data from the participatory platform and the external world.

    Persona

    • Goals: finding specific metrics that demonstrate impact and allow him to quantify and compare good practices with ineffective in terms of UX interaction design in the Arts
    • Background: Researcher in Human Computer Interaction
    • Pronouns: He/They
    • Pain points: finding arts centered platforms that have easily accessible on their analytics and UX data, connecting with peers more oriented towards cultural heritage to collaborate or connect with
    • Needs: An online platform that serves as repository for contacts in the arts, data sets


    User Scenario

    Abirami is a researcher who is writing a report on the effectiveness of different forms of digital engagement and collaboration. His top goals are finding specific metrics that demonstrate impact and allow him to quantify and compare good practices with ineffective ones. He reviews metrics daily because since the pandemia there has been a dynamic online community and shift in terms of how CHI’s engage with their audience. He is often drawn to trending practices especially on social media or content that receives attention i.e. clicks over extended periods of time. He understands the virality or popularity and consistency of participation from users as a basic good. Using the InDICEs platform he often compares the analytics of the participation on the platform to what he sees on social media to understand if there’s a difference in consistency of use or involvement. He sees an opportunity with the InDICEs dashboard in terms of a specific tool that allows him to specify his geographic scope and see what related terms and articles appear daily. He is often sharing information he sees on the dashboard with his peers to see if there’s an opportunity to do a more qualitative dive into what specific conversations or collaborations have gained popularity or long time loyalty. To do this he participates in various discussions and most recently has created a survey that summarises his work and is testing it with the InDICEs community to see if there are variations, consistencies, or outliers. 



    "]
  • +["<h4>What if:</h4><p>Scenario 4: What if as a (role) researcher I could (action) analyze data in the participatory platform with (Tools/Data/features from the inDICEs observatory) the inDICEs (webLyzard) dashboard so that (outcome/Impact) allow to analyze and compare data from the participatory platform and the external world.</p><h4>Persona</h4><ul><li>Goals: finding specific metrics that demonstrate impact and allow him to quantify and compare good practices with ineffective in terms of UX interaction design in the Arts</li><li>Background: Researcher in Human Computer Interaction</li><li>Pronouns: He/They</li><li>Pain points: finding arts centered platforms that have easily accessible on their analytics and UX data, connecting with peers more oriented towards cultural heritage to collaborate or connect with</li><li>Needs: An online platform that serves as repository for contacts in the arts, data sets</li></ul><p><br></p><h4>User Scenario</h4><p>Abirami is a researcher who is writing a report on the effectiveness of different forms of digital engagement and collaboration. His top goals are finding specific metrics that demonstrate impact and allow him to quantify and compare good practices with ineffective ones. He reviews metrics daily because since the pandemia there has been a dynamic online community and shift in terms of how CHI’s engage with their audience. He is often drawn to trending practices especially on social media or content that receives attention i.e. clicks over extended periods of time. He understands the virality or popularity and consistency of participation from users as a basic good. Using the InDICEs platform he often compares the analytics of the participation on the platform to what he sees on social media to understand if there’s a difference in consistency of use or involvement. He sees an opportunity with the InDICEs dashboard in terms of a specific tool that allows him to specify his geographic scope and see what related terms and articles appear daily. He is often sharing information he sees on the dashboard with his peers to see if there’s an opportunity to do a more qualitative dive into what specific conversations or collaborations have gained popularity or long time loyalty. To do this he participates in various discussions and most recently has created a survey that summarises his work and is testing it with the InDICEs community to see if there are variations, consistencies, or outliers.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><h4><br></h4>"]
Eliminazioni
  • Background: Researcher in Human Computer Interaction
  • Pronouns: He/They
  • Pain points: finding arts centered platforms that have easily accessible on their analytics and UX data, connecting with peers more oriented towards cultural heritage to collaborate or connect with
  • Needs: An online platform that serves as repository for contacts in the arts, data sets


User Scenario

Abirami is a researcher who is writing a report on the effectiveness of different forms of digital engagement and collaboration. His top goals are finding specific metrics that demonstrate impact and allow him to quantify and compare good practices with ineffective ones. He reviews metrics daily because since the pandemia there has been a dynamic online community and shift in terms of how CHI’s engage with their audience. He is often drawn to trending practices especially on social media or content that receives attention i.e. clicks over extended periods of time. He understands the virality or popularity and consistency of participation from users as a basic good. Using the InDICEs platform he often compares the analytics of the participation on the platform to what he sees on social media to understand if there’s a difference in consistency of use or involvement. He sees an opportunity with the InDICEs dashboard in terms of a specific tool that allows him to specify his geographic scope and see what related terms and articles appear daily. He is often sharing information he sees on the dashboard with his peers to see if there’s an opportunity to do a more qualitative dive into what specific conversations or collaborations have gained popularity or long time loyalty. To do this he participates in various discussions and most recently has created a survey that summarises his work and is testing it with the InDICEs community to see if there are variations, consistencies, or outliers. 



"]
Aggiunte
  • +["

    What if:

    Scenario 4: What if as a (role) researcher I could (action) analyze data in the participatory platform with (Tools/Data/features from the inDICEs observatory) the inDICEs (webLyzard) dashboard so that (outcome/Impact) allow to analyze and compare data from the participatory platform and the external world.

    Persona

    • Goals: finding specific metrics that demonstrate impact and allow him to quantify and compare good practices with ineffective in terms of UX interaction design in the Arts
    • Background: Researcher in Human Computer Interaction
    • Pronouns: He/They
    • Pain points: finding arts centered platforms that have easily accessible on their analytics and UX data, connecting with peers more oriented towards cultural heritage to collaborate or connect with
    • Needs: An online platform that serves as repository for contacts in the arts, data sets


    User Scenario

    Abirami is a researcher who is writing a report on the effectiveness of different forms of digital engagement and collaboration. His top goals are finding specific metrics that demonstrate impact and allow him to quantify and compare good practices with ineffective ones. He reviews metrics daily because since the pandemia there has been a dynamic online community and shift in terms of how CHI’s engage with their audience. He is often drawn to trending practices especially on social media or content that receives attention i.e. clicks over extended periods of time. He understands the virality or popularity and consistency of participation from users as a basic good. Using the InDICEs platform he often compares the analytics of the participation on the platform to what he sees on social media to understand if there’s a difference in consistency of use or involvement. He sees an opportunity with the InDICEs dashboard in terms of a specific tool that allows him to specify his geographic scope and see what related terms and articles appear daily. He is often sharing information he sees on the dashboard with his peers to see if there’s an opportunity to do a more qualitative dive into what specific conversations or collaborations have gained popularity or long time loyalty. To do this he participates in various discussions and most recently has created a survey that summarises his work and is testing it with the InDICEs community to see if there are variations, consistencies, or outliers. 



    "]
Eliminazioni
Aggiunte
  • +["<h4>What if:</h4><p>Scenario 4: What if as a (role) researcher I could (action) analyze data in the participatory platform with (Tools/Data/features from the inDICEs observatory) the inDICEs (webLyzard) dashboard so that (outcome/Impact) allow to analyze and compare data from the participatory platform and the external world.</p><h4>Persona</h4><ul><li>Goals: finding specific metrics that demonstrate impact and allow him to quantify and compare good practices with ineffective in terms of UX interaction design in the Arts</li><li>Background: Researcher in Human Computer Interaction</li><li>Pronouns: He/They</li><li>Pain points: finding arts centered platforms that have easily accessible on their analytics and UX data, connecting with peers more oriented towards cultural heritage to collaborate or connect with</li><li>Needs: An online platform that serves as repository for contacts in the arts, data sets</li></ul><p><br></p><h4>User Scenario</h4><p>Abirami is a researcher who is writing a report on the effectiveness of different forms of digital engagement and collaboration. His top goals are finding specific metrics that demonstrate impact and allow him to quantify and compare good practices with ineffective ones. He reviews metrics daily because since the pandemia there has been a dynamic online community and shift in terms of how CHI’s engage with their audience. He is often drawn to trending practices especially on social media or content that receives attention i.e. clicks over extended periods of time. He understands the virality or popularity and consistency of participation from users as a basic good. Using the InDICEs platform he often compares the analytics of the participation on the platform to what he sees on social media to understand if there’s a difference in consistency of use or involvement. He sees an opportunity with the InDICEs dashboard in terms of a specific tool that allows him to specify his geographic scope and see what related terms and articles appear daily. He is often sharing information he sees on the dashboard with his peers to see if there’s an opportunity to do a more qualitative dive into what specific conversations or collaborations have gained popularity or long time loyalty. To do this he participates in various discussions and most recently has created a survey that summarises his work and is testing it with the InDICEs community to see if there are variations, consistencies, or outliers.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><h4><br></h4>"]
Numero della versione 1 di 1 Mostra tutte le versioni Torna alla proposta
Autore della versione
Avatar: Nadia Nadesan Nadia Nadesan
Versione creata il 16/03/2021 12:35
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Change Impact Assessment Framework
  • Scarica i file Open Data
Europe flag
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 870792.
The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the European Union.
Neither the EASME nor the European Commission is responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
Creative Commons License Website made with free software.
Decidim Logo
Made by Platoniq

Conferma

Ok Annulla

Per cortesia, effettua l'accesso

Hai dimenticato la password?