This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about cookies.
Skip to main content
  • English Choose language Scegli la lingua
    • Italiano
Sign Up Sign In
  • Home
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Assemblies
  • Dashboard Lite
  • Help

Self Assessment and Monitoring Strategies

Extra Guidance

  • About
  • Self-Assessment Tools
Help
Help
Help

A participatory process is a sequence of participatory activities (e.g. first filling out a survey, then making proposals, discussing them in face-to-face or virtual meetings, and finally prioritizing them) with the aim of defining and making a decision on a specific topic.

Examples of participatory processes are: a process of electing committee members (where candidatures are first presented, then debated and finally a candidacy is chosen), participatory budgets (where proposals are made, valued economically and voted on with the money available), a strategic planning process, the collaborative drafting of a regulation or norm, the design of an urban space or the production of a public policy plan.

Close help

About this process

This process belongs to Guidelines for CHIs Digital Transformation

In the last few years, we have seen a large number of online assessment and monitoring tools being developed to support cultural heritage organisations in their digital transformation. This is a result of a policy-driven trend in the cultural and creative sector for institutions to measure and demonstrate their performance as well as assess their capacity for digital transformation, especially for the purposes of securing public and private funding. The questions and guidance that these self-assessment tools offer, provide a good indication of what is perceived as digital transformation in the heritage sector and how institutions are encouraged to translate it into concrete digital strategies.

In the last few years, we have seen a large number of online assessment and monitoring tools being developed to support cultural heritage organisations in their digital transformation. This is a result of a policy-driven trend in the cultural and creative sector for institutions to measure and demonstrate their performance as well as assess their capacity for digital transformation, especially for the purposes of securing public and private funding. The questions and guidance that these self-assessment tools offer, provide a good indication of what is perceived as digital transformation in the heritage sector and how institutions are encouraged to translate it into concrete digital strategies.


What is self-assessment?

Simply put, self-assessment is an opportunity to reflect on how far you’ve come and take action to determine where you want to go next. It’s about benchmarking your current activities against your goals and targets. More concretely, self-assessment is usually a list of questions about different processes and activities that an organisation asks itself in order to monitor its performance. The act of raising those questions within the organisation is one of the goals of this process. These questions can cover many different operational aspects - from curation and programming, to fundraising, staff development and competencies with digital technologies.


Why is self-assessment important?

A number of online assessment and monitoring tools for cultural heritage organisations have been developed over the last five years, and you will have an opportunity to test them out in the next part of the course. This interest in self-assessment strategies points us to the growing push for data-driven organisational culture - a mindset where decisions are informed by systematic gathering and analysis of data. Here data is considered not as a reporting instrument but rather a tool to constantly monitor and steer your performance towards the organisational goals. Data-driven culture can enable organisations to become more agile and responsible to internal and external forces as they can use insights from data to iteratively adjust.

Data is also an important advocacy instrument. As visualised in the figure below, self-monitoring data can influence decision makers - these can be internal (senior managers, department heads) or external (funding bodies, policy makers, heritage networks). For instance, within an organisation self-monitoring data can help managers better distribute resources between different departments or identify topics for new projects and staff trainings. The Enumerate surveys conducted over a number of years by Europeana are a great example of data being used to influence external stakeholders. Enumerate aggregates self-assessment data from individual organisations across Europe to provide a landscape overview of the status quo in the sector. This helps policy makers assess where the sector is succeeding and where additional support (policy changes, funding, capacity building) is needed. 


How to benefit from self-assessment?

To fully benefit from self-assessment, it is important to involve a variety of representatives from different departments within an organisation in this activity. Self-assessment tools cover many areas of work and require in-depth understanding of procedures and processes at different departments and levels. 

While each organisation might devise their own self-assessment strategies and identify self-monitoring questions that are specific to their needs, the use of already existing tools is beneficial for multiple reasons:

  • It enables organisations to benchmark themselves against other organisations in the same region or similar context which can be used to identify areas of potential improvement or complementarity. 
  • It gives organisations a fresh outsider perspective by challenging them to answer questions they haven’t thought about before.
  • It standardises data collection activities across a large number of organisations which provides decision makers with a comprehensive picture of the sector that they can use to make decisions regarding funding, talent development, policy, etc. 
  • It contributes to the creation of a critical mass of data about the impact of the sector which helps to raise awareness about its contribution to society and economy. 


In the next section of the course, you will be asked to try out existing self-assessment tools and test your knowledge about self-assessment.

Reference: IN-PART-2022-12-33

Share:

link-intact Share link

Share link:

Please paste this code in your page:

<script src="https://participate.indices-culture.eu/processes/SelfAssessmentandMonitoringStrategies/embed.js"></script>
<noscript><iframe src="https://participate.indices-culture.eu/processes/SelfAssessmentandMonitoringStrategies/embed.html" frameborder="0" scrolling="vertical"></iframe></noscript>

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Change Impact Assessment Framework
  • Download Open Data files
Europe flag
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 870792.
The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the European Union.
Neither the EASME nor the European Commission is responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
Creative Commons License Website made with free software.
Decidim Logo
Made by Platoniq

Confirm

OK Cancel

Please sign in

Sign up

Forgot your password?