This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about cookies.
Skip to main content
  • English Choose language Scegli la lingua
    • Italiano
Sign In
  • Home
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Assemblies
  • Dashboard Lite
  • Help

Copyright Office Hours

Community Room

  • About
  • Meetings
  • Debates
  • Blog

Changes at "To what extent is UK law harmonised with EU law?"

Compare view mode:
  • Unified
    • Unified
    • Side-by-side
HTML view mode:
  • Unescaped
    • Unescaped
    • Escaped

Description (English)

  • -

    Despite the UK’s exit from the European Union, the copyright system of the UK is largely in line with EU copyright law. This means that the main exclusive rights copyright grants (like reproduction right, right of communication to the public), which allow the commercial exploitation of the copyrighted work and enable rightsholders to prevent certain uses of their work by others without their permission, are still observed under UK copyright law.  The same applies to the originality criteria as developed by the Court of Justice (CJEU) judgements. CJEU’s judgements and interpretations of EU law dating up to the end of the Brexit transitional period (31 December 2020) still continue to apply in the UK. However, things may change and in future copyright rules of the UK may be altered and diverge from the rules of the EU.

    One of the fundamental facts about copyright law is that it is territorial in nature. While copyright rules in the European Union are largely harmonised, for economic rights in particular (such as the right of reproduction or communication to the public), the rules may still change from member state to member state. This means that, for example, though one work is protected by copyright in one country, it may not be in another one.

    The fragmentation of copyright rules in the EU is evident particularly in moral rights, which protect authors´ non-economic interests in their work, as well as in the exceptions and limitations to copyright. The 2001

    Information Society Directive explicitly leaves moral rights out of the scope of the Directive and leaves their regulation to the national laws of member states. As for copyright exceptions, it is also important to consult the national laws of member states. Most exceptions are optional under EU law and therefore may not have been transposed at the member state level (i.e. added to the national laws of a given member state) or may have been implemented with variations.


  • +

    Despite the UK’s exit from the European Union, the copyright system of the UK is largely in line with EU copyright law. This means that the main exclusive rights copyright grants (like reproduction right, right of communication to the public), which allow the commercial exploitation of the copyrighted work and enable rightsholders to prevent certain uses of their work by others without their permission, are still observed under UK copyright law. The same applies to the originality criteria as developed by the Court of Justice (CJEU) judgements. CJEU’s judgements and interpretations of EU law dating up to the end of the Brexit transitional period (31 December 2020) still continue to apply in the UK. However, things may change and in future copyright rules of the UK may be altered and diverge from the rules of the EU.

    One of the fundamental facts about copyright law is that it is territorial in nature. While copyright rules in the European Union are largely harmonised, for economic rights in particular (such as the right of reproduction or communication to the public), the rules may still change from member state to member state. This means that, for example, though one work is protected by copyright in one country, it may not be in another one.

    The fragmentation of copyright rules in the EU is evident particularly in moral rights, which protect authors´ non-economic interests in their work, as well as in the exceptions and limitations to copyright. The 2001

    Information Society Directive explicitly leaves moral rights out of the scope of the Directive and leaves their regulation to the national laws of member states. As for copyright exceptions, it is also important to consult the national laws of member states. Most exceptions are optional under EU law and therefore may not have been transposed at the member state level (i.e. added to the national laws of a given member state) or may have been implemented with variations.

  • -<p>Despite the UK’s exit from the European Union, the copyright system of the UK is largely in line with EU copyright law. This means that the main exclusive rights copyright grants (like reproduction right, right of communication to the public), which allow the commercial exploitation of the copyrighted work and enable rightsholders to prevent certain uses of their work by others without their permission, are still observed under UK copyright law.&nbsp; The same applies to the originality criteria as developed by the Court of Justice (CJEU) judgements. CJEU’s judgements and interpretations of EU law dating up to the end of the Brexit transitional period (31 December 2020) still continue to apply in the UK. However, things may change and in future copyright rules of the UK may be altered and diverge from the rules of the EU.</p><p>One of the fundamental facts about copyright law is that it is territorial in nature. While copyright rules in the European Union are largely harmonised, for economic rights in particular (such as the right of reproduction or communication to the public), the rules may still change from member state to member state. This means that, for example, though one work is protected by copyright in one country, it may not be in another one.</p><p>The fragmentation of copyright rules in the EU is evident particularly in moral rights, which protect authors´ non-economic interests in their work, as well as in the exceptions and limitations to copyright. The 2001 </p><p><a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32001L0029" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Information Society Directive</a> explicitly leaves moral rights out of the scope of the Directive and leaves their regulation to the national laws of member states. As for copyright exceptions, it is also important to consult the national laws of member states. Most exceptions are optional under EU law and therefore may not have been transposed at the member state level (i.e. added to the national laws of a given member state) or may have been implemented with variations.</p><p><br></p>
  • +<p>Despite the UK’s exit from the European Union, the copyright system of the UK is largely in line with EU copyright law. This means that the main exclusive rights copyright grants (like reproduction right, right of communication to the public), which allow the commercial exploitation of the copyrighted work and enable rightsholders to prevent certain uses of their work by others without their permission, are still observed under UK copyright law.&nbsp;The same applies to the originality criteria as developed by the Court of Justice (CJEU) judgements. CJEU’s judgements and interpretations of EU law dating up to the end of the Brexit transitional period (31 December 2020) still continue to apply in the UK. However, things may change and in future copyright rules of the UK may be altered and diverge from the rules of the EU.</p><p>One of the fundamental facts about copyright law is that it is territorial in nature. While copyright rules in the European Union are largely harmonised, for economic rights in particular (such as the right of reproduction or communication to the public), the rules may still change from member state to member state. This means that, for example, though one work is protected by copyright in one country, it may not be in another one.</p><p>The fragmentation of copyright rules in the EU is evident particularly in moral rights, which protect authors´ non-economic interests in their work, as well as in the exceptions and limitations to copyright. The 2001</p><p><a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32001L0029" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Information Society Directive</a> explicitly leaves moral rights out of the scope of the Directive and leaves their regulation to the national laws of member states. As for copyright exceptions, it is also important to consult the national laws of member states. Most exceptions are optional under EU law and therefore may not have been transposed at the member state level (i.e. added to the national laws of a given member state) or may have been implemented with variations.</p>
Deletions
  • -

    Despite the UK’s exit from the European Union, the copyright system of the UK is largely in line with EU copyright law. This means that the main exclusive rights copyright grants (like reproduction right, right of communication to the public), which allow the commercial exploitation of the copyrighted work and enable rightsholders to prevent certain uses of their work by others without their permission, are still observed under UK copyright law.  The same applies to the originality criteria as developed by the Court of Justice (CJEU) judgements. CJEU’s judgements and interpretations of EU law dating up to the end of the Brexit transitional period (31 December 2020) still continue to apply in the UK. However, things may change and in future copyright rules of the UK may be altered and diverge from the rules of the EU.

    One of the fundamental facts about copyright law is that it is territorial in nature. While copyright rules in the European Union are largely harmonised, for economic rights in particular (such as the right of reproduction or communication to the public), the rules may still change from member state to member state. This means that, for example, though one work is protected by copyright in one country, it may not be in another one.

    The fragmentation of copyright rules in the EU is evident particularly in moral rights, which protect authors´ non-economic interests in their work, as well as in the exceptions and limitations to copyright. The 2001

    Information Society Directive explicitly leaves moral rights out of the scope of the Directive and leaves their regulation to the national laws of member states. As for copyright exceptions, it is also important to consult the national laws of member states. Most exceptions are optional under EU law and therefore may not have been transposed at the member state level (i.e. added to the national laws of a given member state) or may have been implemented with variations.


Additions
  • +

    Despite the UK’s exit from the European Union, the copyright system of the UK is largely in line with EU copyright law. This means that the main exclusive rights copyright grants (like reproduction right, right of communication to the public), which allow the commercial exploitation of the copyrighted work and enable rightsholders to prevent certain uses of their work by others without their permission, are still observed under UK copyright law. The same applies to the originality criteria as developed by the Court of Justice (CJEU) judgements. CJEU’s judgements and interpretations of EU law dating up to the end of the Brexit transitional period (31 December 2020) still continue to apply in the UK. However, things may change and in future copyright rules of the UK may be altered and diverge from the rules of the EU.

    One of the fundamental facts about copyright law is that it is territorial in nature. While copyright rules in the European Union are largely harmonised, for economic rights in particular (such as the right of reproduction or communication to the public), the rules may still change from member state to member state. This means that, for example, though one work is protected by copyright in one country, it may not be in another one.

    The fragmentation of copyright rules in the EU is evident particularly in moral rights, which protect authors´ non-economic interests in their work, as well as in the exceptions and limitations to copyright. The 2001

    Information Society Directive explicitly leaves moral rights out of the scope of the Directive and leaves their regulation to the national laws of member states. As for copyright exceptions, it is also important to consult the national laws of member states. Most exceptions are optional under EU law and therefore may not have been transposed at the member state level (i.e. added to the national laws of a given member state) or may have been implemented with variations.

Deletions
  • -<p>Despite the UK’s exit from the European Union, the copyright system of the UK is largely in line with EU copyright law. This means that the main exclusive rights copyright grants (like reproduction right, right of communication to the public), which allow the commercial exploitation of the copyrighted work and enable rightsholders to prevent certain uses of their work by others without their permission, are still observed under UK copyright law.&nbsp; The same applies to the originality criteria as developed by the Court of Justice (CJEU) judgements. CJEU’s judgements and interpretations of EU law dating up to the end of the Brexit transitional period (31 December 2020) still continue to apply in the UK. However, things may change and in future copyright rules of the UK may be altered and diverge from the rules of the EU.</p><p>One of the fundamental facts about copyright law is that it is territorial in nature. While copyright rules in the European Union are largely harmonised, for economic rights in particular (such as the right of reproduction or communication to the public), the rules may still change from member state to member state. This means that, for example, though one work is protected by copyright in one country, it may not be in another one.</p><p>The fragmentation of copyright rules in the EU is evident particularly in moral rights, which protect authors´ non-economic interests in their work, as well as in the exceptions and limitations to copyright. The 2001 </p><p><a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32001L0029" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Information Society Directive</a> explicitly leaves moral rights out of the scope of the Directive and leaves their regulation to the national laws of member states. As for copyright exceptions, it is also important to consult the national laws of member states. Most exceptions are optional under EU law and therefore may not have been transposed at the member state level (i.e. added to the national laws of a given member state) or may have been implemented with variations.</p><p><br></p>
Additions
  • +<p>Despite the UK’s exit from the European Union, the copyright system of the UK is largely in line with EU copyright law. This means that the main exclusive rights copyright grants (like reproduction right, right of communication to the public), which allow the commercial exploitation of the copyrighted work and enable rightsholders to prevent certain uses of their work by others without their permission, are still observed under UK copyright law.&nbsp;The same applies to the originality criteria as developed by the Court of Justice (CJEU) judgements. CJEU’s judgements and interpretations of EU law dating up to the end of the Brexit transitional period (31 December 2020) still continue to apply in the UK. However, things may change and in future copyright rules of the UK may be altered and diverge from the rules of the EU.</p><p>One of the fundamental facts about copyright law is that it is territorial in nature. While copyright rules in the European Union are largely harmonised, for economic rights in particular (such as the right of reproduction or communication to the public), the rules may still change from member state to member state. This means that, for example, though one work is protected by copyright in one country, it may not be in another one.</p><p>The fragmentation of copyright rules in the EU is evident particularly in moral rights, which protect authors´ non-economic interests in their work, as well as in the exceptions and limitations to copyright. The 2001</p><p><a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32001L0029" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Information Society Directive</a> explicitly leaves moral rights out of the scope of the Directive and leaves their regulation to the national laws of member states. As for copyright exceptions, it is also important to consult the national laws of member states. Most exceptions are optional under EU law and therefore may not have been transposed at the member state level (i.e. added to the national laws of a given member state) or may have been implemented with variations.</p>

Instructions to participate (English)

  • -

    By adding a comment on the section below, you can add further questions, thoughts, answers or comments on this topic that will be moderated by inDICEs project partners and visible to other participants in this space.



  • +

    By adding a comment on the section below, you can add further questions, thoughts, answers or comments on this topic that will be moderated by inDICEs project partners and visible to other participants in this space.

  • -<p>By adding a comment on the section below, you can add further questions, thoughts, answers or comments on this topic that will be moderated by inDICEs project partners and visible to other participants in this space.</p><p><br></p><p><br></p>
  • +<p>By adding a comment on the section below, you can add further questions, thoughts, answers or comments on this topic that will be moderated by inDICEs project partners and visible to other participants in this space.</p>
Deletions
  • -

    By adding a comment on the section below, you can add further questions, thoughts, answers or comments on this topic that will be moderated by inDICEs project partners and visible to other participants in this space.



Additions
  • +

    By adding a comment on the section below, you can add further questions, thoughts, answers or comments on this topic that will be moderated by inDICEs project partners and visible to other participants in this space.

Deletions
  • -<p>By adding a comment on the section below, you can add further questions, thoughts, answers or comments on this topic that will be moderated by inDICEs project partners and visible to other participants in this space.</p><p><br></p><p><br></p>
Additions
  • +<p>By adding a comment on the section below, you can add further questions, thoughts, answers or comments on this topic that will be moderated by inDICEs project partners and visible to other participants in this space.</p>
Version number 3 out of 3 Show all versions Go back to debate
Version author
Avatar: Kris Petrasova Kris Petrasova
Version created at 24/04/2023 13:08
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Change Impact Assessment Framework
  • Download Open Data files
Europe flag
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 870792.
The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the European Union.
Neither the EASME nor the European Commission is responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
Creative Commons License Website made with free software.
Decidim Logo
Made by Platoniq

Confirm

OK Cancel

Please sign in

Forgot your password?