This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about cookies.
Skip to main content
  • English Choose language Scegli la lingua
    • Italiano
Sign Up Sign In
  • Home
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Assemblies
  • Dashboard Lite
  • Help

Hypotheses and Insights

Propose a hypothesis and share your findings

  • About
  • Members
  • Learn More 💡
  • Hypotheses 🗃️
  • Insights

Changes at "Something completely different, or more of the same? TikTok and the “democratization” of cultural content production"

Compare view mode:
  • Unified
    • Unified
    • Side-by-side
HTML view mode:
  • Unescaped
    • Unescaped
    • Escaped

Title

  • +{"en"=>"Something completely different, or more of the same? TikTok and the “democratization” of cultural content production"}
  • +{"en"=>"Something completely different, or more of the same? TikTok and the “democratization” of cultural content production"}
Deletions
Additions
  • +{"en"=>"Something completely different, or more of the same? TikTok and the “democratization” of cultural content production"}
Deletions
Additions
  • +{"en"=>"Something completely different, or more of the same? TikTok and the “democratization” of cultural content production"}

Body

  • +["
    Context
    Social media and digital production tools have provided a big impulse to the possibility of a democratization\nof cultural content production. However, enhanced viability does not imply an actual capacity to tap into\nthe opportunity. Research on established social media such as Twitter, Facebook and Instagram show that\ncontent production, and especially the most popular contents, is mostly driven by a small elite of super-\nusers, and an additional but still small share of content creators.
    Hypothesis
    With this dataset, we wonder whether a more recent social media such as TikTok - whose design features are optimized to facilitate individual content production and to enhance visibility of content from unknown users - actually makes a difference in the production of digital cultural content.
    Collaboration
    Related dataset URL
    https://participate.indices-culture.eu/assemblies/indicesDatasets/f/163/proposals/206
    Related insights URL
    Indicators
    Evaluation
    "]
  • +["<xml><dl class=\"decidim_awesome-custom_fields\" data-generator=\"decidim_awesome\" data-version=\"0.8.3\"><dt name=\"textarea-1635451235315\">Context</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451235315\" name=\"textarea\"><div>Social media and digital production tools have provided a big impulse to the possibility of a democratization\nof cultural content production. However, enhanced viability does not imply an actual capacity to tap into\nthe opportunity. Research on established social media such as Twitter, Facebook and Instagram show that\ncontent production, and especially the most popular contents, is mostly driven by a small elite of super-\nusers, and an additional but still small share of content creators.</div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451312580\">Hypothesis</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451312580\" name=\"text\"><div>With this dataset, we wonder whether a more recent social media such as TikTok - whose design features are optimized to facilitate individual content production and to enhance visibility of content from unknown users - actually makes a difference in the production of digital cultural content.</div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451372562\">Collaboration</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451372562\" name=\"text\"><div></div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451427513\">Related dataset URL</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451427513\" name=\"text\"><div>https://participate.indices-culture.eu/assemblies/indicesDatasets/f/163/proposals/206</div></dd><dt name=\"textarea-1669973821818-0\">Related insights URL</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1669973821818-0\" name=\"textarea\"><div></div></dd><dt name=\"textarea-1635451479530\">Indicators</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451479530\" name=\"textarea\"><div></div></dd><dt name=\"textarea-1635451518445\">Evaluation</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451518445\" name=\"textarea\"><div></div></dd></dl></xml>"]
Deletions
Additions
  • +["
    Context
    Social media and digital production tools have provided a big impulse to the possibility of a democratization\nof cultural content production. However, enhanced viability does not imply an actual capacity to tap into\nthe opportunity. Research on established social media such as Twitter, Facebook and Instagram show that\ncontent production, and especially the most popular contents, is mostly driven by a small elite of super-\nusers, and an additional but still small share of content creators.
    Hypothesis
    With this dataset, we wonder whether a more recent social media such as TikTok - whose design features are optimized to facilitate individual content production and to enhance visibility of content from unknown users - actually makes a difference in the production of digital cultural content.
    Collaboration
    Related dataset URL
    https://participate.indices-culture.eu/assemblies/indicesDatasets/f/163/proposals/206
    Related insights URL
    Indicators
    Evaluation
    "]
Deletions
Additions
  • +["<xml><dl class=\"decidim_awesome-custom_fields\" data-generator=\"decidim_awesome\" data-version=\"0.8.3\"><dt name=\"textarea-1635451235315\">Context</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451235315\" name=\"textarea\"><div>Social media and digital production tools have provided a big impulse to the possibility of a democratization\nof cultural content production. However, enhanced viability does not imply an actual capacity to tap into\nthe opportunity. Research on established social media such as Twitter, Facebook and Instagram show that\ncontent production, and especially the most popular contents, is mostly driven by a small elite of super-\nusers, and an additional but still small share of content creators.</div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451312580\">Hypothesis</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451312580\" name=\"text\"><div>With this dataset, we wonder whether a more recent social media such as TikTok - whose design features are optimized to facilitate individual content production and to enhance visibility of content from unknown users - actually makes a difference in the production of digital cultural content.</div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451372562\">Collaboration</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451372562\" name=\"text\"><div></div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451427513\">Related dataset URL</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451427513\" name=\"text\"><div>https://participate.indices-culture.eu/assemblies/indicesDatasets/f/163/proposals/206</div></dd><dt name=\"textarea-1669973821818-0\">Related insights URL</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1669973821818-0\" name=\"textarea\"><div></div></dd><dt name=\"textarea-1635451479530\">Indicators</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451479530\" name=\"textarea\"><div></div></dd><dt name=\"textarea-1635451518445\">Evaluation</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451518445\" name=\"textarea\"><div></div></dd></dl></xml>"]
Version number 1 out of 1 Show all versions Go back to proposal
Version author
Avatar: Antoine Antoine
Version created at 26/02/2023 12:23
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Change Impact Assessment Framework
  • Download Open Data files
Europe flag
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 870792.
The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the European Union.
Neither the EASME nor the European Commission is responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
Creative Commons License Website made with free software.
Decidim Logo
Made by Platoniq

Confirm

OK Cancel

Please sign in

Sign up

Forgot your password?