This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about cookies.
Skip to main content
  • English Choose language Scegli la lingua
    • Italiano
Sign Up Sign In
  • Home
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Assemblies
  • Change Assessment
  • Help

Hypotheses and Insights

Propose a hypothesis and share your findings

  • About
  • Members
  • Learn More 💡
  • Hypotheses 🗃️
  • Insights
chevron-left Back to list

Operationalizing and Measuring online democratic deliberation with hybrid methods and open participation.

Avatar: Platoniq Platoniq verified-badge
23/11/2021 15:59  

Context
Skeptics of deliberative democracy question the practical viability of deliberative democracy: its ideals have been criticized as utopian and its forums have been dismissed as mere experiments, with no hope of being effectively institutionalized. On the other hand avoid participatory washing at the insititutional level.
Hypothesis
Does the digital participation process increase trust in democracy?
Collaboration
Creating an open space with list and definition of indicators / Metrics - Custom Fields proposals . Hierachización ---> activating the metadeicim community - governance - next open an hibrid debate politco - diseño y participant Experience.
Related data
We use data from the Conference on the Future of Europe online participation platform, which is based on Decidim
Indicators
Deliberation, Relevance, Width / Depth
Evaluation
Contributors will prioritze indicators (MVP), propose new criterio and indicators. Nomenclature, enrich definition of indicators, operationalization (depth level is not enough)

AUTOMATED DATA CONTENT ANALYSIS

  • Keyword Graph
  • Geomap
  • Tag Cloud
Sources:
Date range:  
Color codes for sentiment analysis: Negative vs Positive
Improve Hypothesis Improve this hypothesis by modifying its title and body
0 Supports
Endorsements count0
Operationalizing and Measuring online democratic deliberation with hybrid methods and open participation. Comments 0

Reference: IN-PROP-2021-11-158
Version number 2 (of 2) see other versions
Check fingerprint

Fingerprint

The piece of text below is a shortened, hashed representation of this content. It's useful to ensure the content hasn't been tampered with, as a single modification would result in a totally different value.

Value: 84ba4a1a4595eba819e5cc0f2309809f555edab5efc7ad8182fb112292822afb

Source: {"body":{"en":"<xml><dl class=\"decidim_awesome-custom_fields\" data-generator=\"decidim_awesome\" data-version=\"0.7.2\"><dt name=\"textarea-1635451235315\">Context</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451235315\" name=\"textarea\"><div>Skeptics of deliberative democracy question the practical viability of deliberative democracy: its ideals have been criticized as utopian and its forums have been dismissed as mere experiments, with no hope of being effectively institutionalized. On the other hand avoid participatory washing at the insititutional level.</div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451312580\">Hypothesis</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451312580\" name=\"text\"><div>Does the digital participation process increase trust in democracy?</div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451372562\">Collaboration</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451372562\" name=\"text\"><div>Creating an open space with list and definition of indicators / Metrics - Custom Fields proposals . Hierachización ---&amp;amp;amp;gt; activating the metadeicim community - governance - next open an hibrid debate politco - diseño y participant Experience.</div></dd><dt name=\"text-1635451427513\">Related data</dt><dd id=\"text-1635451427513\" name=\"text\"><div>We use data from the Conference on the Future of Europe online participation platform, which is based on Decidim</div></dd><dt name=\"textarea-1635451479530\">Indicators</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451479530\" name=\"textarea\"><div>Deliberation, Relevance, Width / Depth</div></dd><dt name=\"textarea-1635451518445\">Evaluation</dt><dd id=\"textarea-1635451518445\" name=\"textarea\"><div>Contributors will prioritze indicators (MVP), propose new criterio and indicators. Nomenclature, enrich definition of indicators, operationalization (depth level is not enough)</div></dd></dl></xml>"},"title":{"en":"Operationalizing and Measuring online democratic deliberation with hybrid methods and open participation."}}

This fingerprint is calculated using a SHA256 hashing algorithm. In order to replicate it yourself, you can use an MD5 calculator online and copy-paste the source data.

Share:

link-intact Share link

Share link:

Please paste this code in your page:

<script src="https://participate.indices-culture.eu/assemblies/hypotheses/f/83/proposals/158/embed.js"></script>
<noscript><iframe src="https://participate.indices-culture.eu/assemblies/hypotheses/f/83/proposals/158/embed.html" frameborder="0" scrolling="vertical"></iframe></noscript>

Related images

data-democracy-quality.png

Report inappropriate content

Is this content inappropriate?

Reason

0 comments

Order by:
  • Older
    • Best rated
    • Recent
    • Older
    • Most discussed

Add your comment

Sign in with your account or sign up to add your comment.

Loading comments ...

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Change Impact Assessment Framework
  • Download Open Data files
Europe flag
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 870792.
The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the European Union.
Neither the EASME nor the European Commission is responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
Creative Commons License Website made with free software.
Decidim Logo
Made by Platoniq

Confirm

OK Cancel

Please sign in

Sign up

Forgot your password?