[Guest] Europeana Impact Community meets inDICEs

Impact of digital cultural heritage as a driver of social change

Survey for the Culture 3.0

With the use of this survey, we want to collect cases of value chains generated by (re)use of digital cultural heritage in bottom-up initiatives and communities of practice - the so called Culture 3.0 regime. We are focusing here on cases of value chains generated by the reuse of resources by informal initiatives or communities of creators. By the term “(re)use” we understand a broad range of creative activities using digital cultural heritage, including reclaiming, re-appropriation or reinterpretation.

We are assuming that the survey will be filled by someone involved in the given initiative or community, or knowledgeable about the given project.

If any information is lacking, please feel free to skip the question. But try to choose the cases for which you can access information relatively easily.

Any additional information can be shared at the end of the survey.

The task of each person involved in the process is to:

Identify a specific case
Research all necessary information about the case
Analyze it by filling the survey

JavaScript is disabled

Some of this form's features will be disabled. To improve your experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser.

* Required fields are marked with an asterisk

If you are human, ignore this field

1. Name of the initiative or community

2. Link to the initiative or community webpage

Provide the link

3. Short description of the initiative or community

Please describe briefly the initiative or community, in several sentences. Please describe the purpose of the initiative or community, and the digital cultural heritage that is being (re)used.

4. Reuse of digital cultural heritage

Please describe what digital heritage resources were used by this initiative or community. Please give as much detail as possible and provide a link to the original version of the resources, if available.

5. How were access and (re)use rights obtained

Please describe whether the resources are openly accessible or the necessary rights were obtained in another way.

6. Role of the Cultural Heritage Institution

Was the institution that holds the digital heritage resource(s) involved in this initiative or supported this community? What was its role?

7. Resource application

Please describe how digital cultural heritage resources are being (re)used in this initiative or community.

8. Funding source and other resources

Please describe the funding source for the initiative or community, if such funding existed. Was it funded from public or private sources? What was the funding model? Have any other important resources been made available for this initiative or community?

9. Target groups/reach of the initiative or community

Please list and briefly describe the target group(s) or the reach of the initiative or community. Does this initiative reach people beyond the group of (re)users? Have their motivations for benefitting from the given initiative or community been identified? If yes, please describe them.

10. Creation

Please describe key steps in the process of creation of this initative and its dissemination - how it was created and made available for usage by others?

11. Barriers and Obstacles

Please describe key barriers and obstacles encountered by the initiative or community, especially those related to the (re)use of digital cultural heritage. How were these barriers overcome?

12. How many people are benefitting from the initiative or activities of the community?

. <100

100-1000

1000-10 000

10 000-100 000

100 000 - 1 000 000

> 1 000 000

13. Expected impact

What type of impact were the creators of the initiative or community expecting, what were the aims of the project?

14. Achieved impact

In our project, we are using an 8-tier approach to measuring impact developed by the FKB foundation. Please rate the impact of the product or service in each of the eight areas of impact. Also - please justify in your own words each answer you give.

	1: Not at all	2	3	4	5: Very much
Innovation - has the existence and usage of the product or service promoted new developments (other products, services, phenomena or processes)?	.	.	.	.	.
Welfare - has the existence and usage of the product or service boosted the subjective perception of wellbeing?	.	.	.	.	.
Sustainability - has the existence and usage of the product or service added to the general sustainability of the economies and societies?	.	.	.	.	.
Social Cohesion - has the existence and usage of the product or service promoted social cohesion?	.	.	.	.	.
New entrepreneurship - has the existence and usage of the product or service promoted new businesses or new business models?	.	.	.	.	.
Soft power - has the existence and usage of the product or service increased soft power of the creator's nation state?	.	.	.	.	.
Local identity - has the existence and usage of the product or service boosted the local level attachment in any of the stakeholders?	.	.	.	.	.
Lifelong learning - has the existence and usage of the product or service boosted the possibilities for lifelong learning?	.	.	.	.	.

15. Sources

Please provide any relevant sources of information relating to the initiative or community, activities and their impact.

16. Additional Info

Is there any other relevant information concerning the product or service that you would like to provide? That you think may be valuable but was not covered in the answers you gave above.

17. Contact Information

We will be grateful for sharing your contact information. This will allow us to stay in touch regarding this case study, for example if we would like to ask for additional information. We will also contact you regarding the results of this survey.

Name:

Email:

Phone no:

Other (Facebook, LinkedIn, private www):

By participating you accept its Terms of Service